China’s new tech export restrictions further cloud US TikTok sale and raise the risk of protectionism

Beijing’s new export control list raises the risk of technology protectionism and means greater uncertainty over the sale of TikTok’s US operations as well as more questions for both Chinese companies with overseas businesses and multinationals that create intellectual property in China, experts said on Monday.

The Ministry of Commerce and Ministry of Science and Technology on Friday jointly updated a catalogue of technology exports that are banned or restricted amid rising tensions between the US and China over technology and intellectual property. This is the only revision since the list was first published in 2008.

Among the newly-added restrictions are “personalised information recommendation service technology based on data analysis” and “artificial intelligence interactive interfaces”, one type of which uses voice recognition.

These technologies are widely used by TikTok and other products from Chinese owner ByteDance, all of which curate content feeds based on user preferences and activity.

The new rules also come at a time of worsening trade relations between Washington and Beijing. The Post reported in June that China had prepared a blacklist of US companies after Washington tightened export controls to Huawei Technologies and 33 other Chinese firms in May – only to hold off for fear the move would backfire and damage its economy, citing a source close to the Chinese government.

Friday’s updated rule

requires additional government approval for restricted exports and will likely affect ByteDance’s sale of TikTok in the US, which has been demanded by Washington by mid-November as a condition for it to remain in business there, experts said.

Cui Fan, a professor of international trade at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing, told state news agency Xinhua on Saturday that government agencies had been preparing for an update since 2018 by soliciting public opinion and “made the adjustment this time after consideration … in line with the objective needs [based on] progress of the current international situation.”

“The time to publish the new update of the export control list has been expedited due to the TikTok sale,” Mei Xinyu, a researcher at the Ministry of Commerce, also told the Post on Sunday.

ByteDance General Counsel Erich Andersen said on Sunday that the company is “studying the new regulations that were released Friday.”

“As with any cross-border transaction, we will follow the applicable laws, which in this case include those of the US and China,” said Andersen.

Microsoft, one of the earliest bidders for TikTok and which signed a non-binding Letter of Intent in late July before US President Donald Trump issued the first executive order on TikTok, declined to comment on the update.

Other suitors, including Walmart and Oracle, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

ByteDance’s response “seems to confirm the company is looking into applying for the necessary licences under these new export control rules,” said Nina Palmer, a senior director in the China practice at business strategy firm Albright Stonebridge Group.

“The new rule requires the sale of TikTok to be approved by the Chinese government … as the core competence of ByteDance is its algorithm”, said Mei. “Those US firms that are actively working to pursue the acquisition of TikTok, may need to think whether [a deal] can now be done.”

The Ministry of Commerce in a separate clarification said that government approval for restricted exports would take up to 45 working days, or early November if the process was started on Monday, according to the Post’s calculations.

This means that the approval timetable would be compatible with the November 12 deadline set by Trump’s second TikTok executive order, which asks that ByteDance divest TikTok’s US operations in 90 days.

But “the Chinese government has a history of slow-rolling administrative procedures as a political tactic, so it is not guaranteed that the government will stick to this schedule,” said Palmer.

“In practice, the timeline may vary on a case-by-case basis, especially when the circumstances are more sensitive,” said Nathaniel Rushforth, a US-qualified lawyer and cybersecurity specialist at Shanghai-based DaWo Law Firm, adding that “moves like this signal that technology protectionism is likely to become an even more significant consideration for companies doing business in the US/China context.”

Alex Capri, a visiting senior fellow at the National University of Singapore, questioned whether ByteDance was using technology that was unique to China.

[please click the link below to read the full article]